
more O.G. than most
It touts that the Vampire Diaries is better than Twilight.
Ridiculous surmising coupled with weak reasons, which I will argue against all Aristotle-like:
1.) Believe it or not, The Vampire Diaries came first.
And? What about Anne Rice? Ever heard of Dracula? BTW vampires are thousands of years old.
2.) The Vampire Diaries is bloody, gory and full of killing.
Yeah, which is why girls love Twilight. Love>blood and guts. Anyway, there IS gore, so nasty in fact that it pretty much scarred me for life. Guess this journalist hasn’t read Breaking Dawn.
3.) These sexy vampires actually have sex!
You are fucking clueless. See our header: “Why am I covered in feathers.” Class-A boning.
4.) Elena is an independent young woman.
So is Bella. She flew from Phoenix all by herself, and she does all the chores around the house. What kind of insecure sheep would push a read beater pick-up, btw? Your average barbie would just bro down with the lame girls in Forks, while Bella likes Angela best. Just because Edward protects the shit out of her a lot doesn’t mean Bella can’t hold her own. No pussy would have went head-to-head with James in a ballet studio!
5.) Had it with the Twi-hype? The Vampire Diaries is the underdog.
Talk about commie propaganda masquerading as journalism! I bet your kid is on one of those sports teams that doesn’t keep score. Everyone loves Twilight ’cause it’s beast. You’re saying we should like Vamp Diaries more because it’s not as popular so its feelings aren’t hurt? Whateva. This isn’t NPR. We’ll take the whole Twi massive out for happy meals and the Vamp Diaries crew can watch from the parking lot! We’re onto your subliminal ways, N.Y. Post. Take that garbage to St. Elsewhere, I’ll stick to O Magazine.
Read the rest of this entry »
Recent Comments